National Union Fire Insurance v. Lawyers' Mutual Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADJUDICATING THE ISSUE OF NATIONAL UNION’S INSURANCE POLICY AS EXCESS INSURANCE
BATTAGLIA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Counsel for the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge Battaglia under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to decide the following issue: “Whether the policy issued by National Union at issue in this case is a policy of excess insurance excess over that policy issued by LMIC at issue in this case.” The parties have submitted opening and reply briefs along with exhibits thereto and a hearing was held on May 3, 1995. Plaintiffs counsel was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Garcia v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Olympic Insurance v. Employers Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Star Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- General Star Nat. Ins. Corp. v. World Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1997
- McGill v. American Trucking & Transportation, Ins.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Residence Mutual Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Jaynes Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.