Legal Opinion
State v. Chasteen
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1984No. CA84-06-063PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKoehleR, J.
The pertinent facts of this cause are simple and undisputed. On March 16, 1984, at approximately 1:45 a.m., appellant, Pamela K. Chasteen, was involved in an automobile accident in the city of Fairfield. Both appellant and the other driver stopped to assess the damage. At this time, there was no exchange of information between the drivers; they returned to their respective vehicles and drove away.
The following morning, at approximately 10:00 a.m., the other driver reported this accident to the Fairfield Police Department. After a police investigation, appellant was charged with leaving the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. J.Z.S.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000