Legal Opinion
Wilson v. the Krystal Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 16, 2003No. 5D02-2499PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
844 So.2d 827 (2003)
Dena WILSON, Appellant,
v.
THE KRYSTAL COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 5D02-2499.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 16, 2003.
Richard Prospect, P.A., Port Orange, for Appellant.
Jamie Billotte Moses and Richard W. Smith of Fisher, Rushmer, Werrenrath, Dickson, Talley & Dunlap, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
MONACO, J.
This is an appeal brought by Dena Wilson from the denial of a motion for new trial of her negligence action against the appellee, The Krystal Company ("Krystal"). Because we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, we affirm.
Encapsulated,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. Estate of StuckeySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Bridges v. SpeerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Malcolm v. PatrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Pathway Financial v. MIAMI INTERN. REALTYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Goodis v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of Despain v. Avante Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Tenny v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Hinton v. Supervision Intern., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Feagle v. PurvisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Abreu v. F.E. Development Recycling, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.