Masood v. United States Fire Ins.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, P. J.,
Plaintiff brought an action in assumpsit to recover from the defendant insurance company a loss sustained as a result of fire which destroyed valuable rugs and office furniture. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant insurance company, filed this motion for a new trial, in which it is alleged that the plaintiff, Dr. Masood, was incompetent to testify to the value of the property destroyed, and, secondly, that it was error to have admitted in evidence the proofs of loss, over the objection of the defendant.
Without passing upon the first reason…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kittanning Insurance v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Cole v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Sutton v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Lattavo v. Virginia Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926