Legal Opinion
Union Central Life Insurance v. Prigge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 30, 1903No. Nos. 13,700—(47)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal by defendant Henry F. Greenhagen from an order of the district court for Wright county, Giddings, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This action was brought against defendants, Prigge, as principal, and Greenhagen, as surety, upon a bond executed and delivered by them to the plaintiff, an insurance company. This bond was conditioned that if Prigge, as the company’s agent for procuring applications for life insurance, should
“Pay or hand over all moneys belonging to said company which shall at any time be received by him, or for which he shall be liable, * * * including all moneys so received prior to the date of this instrument (if any such there be) as well as that received thereafter, as also all moneys which he now owes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Capital Fire Insurance v. WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Coleman v. Retail Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. RedFieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Hall v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Traders' Insurance v. HerberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. LundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Cooper v. FrancisArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Theobald Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Lac Qui Parle Town Farmers Union Fire Insurance v. RemsbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.