Legal Opinion

State v. Day

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 3, 1988No. Civ. 6468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

The Medicaid Commissioner determined that the applicant was not eligible for benefits under Rule 560-X-25-.09 of the Alabama Medicaid Agency (Agency). The applicant appealed to the circuit court wherein the applicant was declared to be entitled to receive those benefits. The Agency appealed. Reluctantly, we reverse.

It is provided by Rule 560-X-25-.09 that the transfer of an applicant’s resource for less than its fair market value is presumed to be for the purpose of establishing Medicaid eligibility when the transfer is made within twenty-four months…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. BaggianoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Wood v. BaggianoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miley Hoyt Bell ex rel. Roberta L. Bell v. Tennessee Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API