Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth, Revenue Cabinet v. Smith

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1994No. 93-SC-946-TGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WINTERSHEIMER,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the parts of the Majority Opinion which apparently endorse the legislative philosophy of dedication of tax funds to a particular perceived need. I also concur with the concept of deference to the General Assembly in matters of taxation in general. I further concur with the analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment and Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the Kentucky Constitution. However, I must respectfully dissent from those aspects of the Opinion which deal with the application of constitutional principles to the specific facts of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Revenue CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. BOARD OF ED. OF JEFFERSON CO. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  4. Safety Building & Loan Co. v. EcklarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Gillis v. YountKentucky Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API