Legal Opinion
BTG Int'l Ltd. v. Amneal Pharm. LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 31, 2018No. Civ. No. 15-cv-5909 (KM)(JBC); Civ. No. 16-cv-2449 (KM)(JBC); Civ. No. 17-cv-6435 (KM)(JBC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge
These are consolidated Hatch-Waxman actions for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,822,438 ("the '438 patent") brought by Janssen Biotech, Inc.; Janssen Oncology, Inc.; Janssen Research & Development, LLC (collectively, "Janssen"); and BTG International Ltd. ("BTG"). Janssen and BTG co-own the '438 patent. The '438 patent contains twenty claims covering methods for the treatment of prostate cancer by administering various dosages of abiraterone acetate and prednisone in combination. Patent exclusivity for these medications individually is not…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Btg International Limited v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- BLACKBIRD TECH LLC v. SIGNIFY NORTH AMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- ENCORE DERMATOLOGY INC. v. GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.