Legal Opinion
Cyclops Corporation v. Home Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1973No. Civ. A. 70-1053PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
This is a suit under a boiler and machinery policy including business interruption provisions. There is no dispute as to essential facts, the policy was in force at the time of the incident giving rise to the claim, and the parties have agreed as to the loss sustained. The sole dispute between the parties is whether the circumstances surrounding the incident are sufficient to meet the requirement of an accident as that term is defined in the policy.
The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment.
The insuring clause in effect on January 20, 1969, the time of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J, Cross-Appellant v. The Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Central Louisiana Elec. Co. v. WestinghouseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Dimmitt Chevrolet v. Southeastern FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Meridian Leasing, Inc. v. Associated Aviation Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.