Legal Opinion
Boland v. Fortis Construction Company, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1701Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES BOLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 10-1701 (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell FORTIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund (hereinafter “IPF”) 1 filed this case against defendant Fortis Construction Company, LLC (hereinafter “Fortis”), seeking to collect employer withdrawal liability pursuant to the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendment Act (hereinafter “MPPAA”) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.