Legal Opinion
APT Pittsburgh Ltd. Partnership v. Penn Township
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 8, 1999No. 98-351998-3546UnknownCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Penn Township (“Township”) appeals the District Court’s order directing it to allow APT Pittsburgh Limited Partnership (“APT”) to erect a communications tower for its Personal Communications System (“PCS”) at a designated site within the Township. The Township claims that the District Court erred in concluding that its zoning ordinance was impermissibly exclusionary under the Pennsylvania Constitution. APT defends the District Court’s conclusion on that score and cross-appeals the District Court’s conclusion that the Township’s zoning ordinance did…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Cellular Telephone Company, D/B/A At&t Wireless Services, F/k/a Cellular One New York Smsa Limited Partnership and Its General Partner Cellco Partnership, D/B/A Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile Smart Smr of New York, Inc., D/B/A Nextel Communications v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Ho-Ho-Kus New York Smsa Limited Partnership and Its General Partner Cellco Partnership, D/B/A Bell Atlantic Nynex MobileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Western PCS II Corp. v. Extraterritorial Zoning Authority of Santa FeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Apt Pittsburgh Limited Partnership v. Penn Township Butler County Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Omnipoint Comm Entr v. Zoning HearingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003