Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Tunnell
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 6, 1994No. 1921840PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ford Motor Company ("Ford") and Charles Townsend Ford, Inc. ("Townsend"), have appealed from the trial court's order denying their motion for a JNOV or a new trial, following the entry of an order based on a jury verdict in favor of Steve Tunnell and Susan Tunnell. The Tunnells made several claims, including claims of breach of warranty and a claim that they had revoked their acceptance of a new 1990 Ford F-350 truck they had purchased from Townsend for $24,659 ($23,579 sales price plus $1,080 for an extended warranty).
I
On December 20, 1991, the Tunnells sued Ford, Ford Motor Credit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jewell v. Jackson & Whitsitt Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Moody v. State Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ex Parte Punturo, 1000115 (Ala. 2-8-2002)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Bacadam Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. KennardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Schulte v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Young v. SandlinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Bryant v. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.