Legal Opinion

People v. Stricker

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Writ op Error to the Branch “D” Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago ; the Hon. Edwin K. Walker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

Max Stricker was charged in an amended information, filed in the municipal court of Chicago-, with violating the act entitled “An act to protect associations, unions of workingmen and persons in their labels, trade-marks and forms of advertising,” in force July I, 1891, (Daws of 1891,-p. 202,) as amended by act in force July 1, 1895, (Daws of 1895, p. 320,) by selling a bottle containing a liquid resembling gin, to which bottle was attached a counterfeit or imitation label purporting to be a report on Gordon &: Co.’s “dry gin,” London, dated September 2, 1899, by one E. Godwin Clayton,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. TildenIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. DantumaIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Vincendeau v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Revlon, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API