Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Schroeder

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1999No. 98-CA-0915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I, ARMSTRONG, Judge.

This is an automobile collision personal injury case. The issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs employer effectively rejected uninsured motorisVunderinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage. The trial court granted summary judgment for the insurer. We affirm.

Plaintiff-appellant Joseph Boyd was injured in an automobile accident while he was a passenger in a vehicle which was leased to "his employer, SOLOCO, Inc. (“SOLOCO”), which was insured under a policy issued by the Gray Insurance Company (“Gray”). The policy provided coverage to Newpark Resources, Inc. (“Newpark”) and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daigle v. AuthementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Washington v. SavoieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Moyles v. CruzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Lefeaux v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Henderson v. MaloidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. HetlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Bordelon v. Western Heritage Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API