Gandal v. Finn
New York Supreme Court
HIS was a motion by Gandal, plaintiff in the first above entitled action, to set aside the judgments entered on confession in the second and third actions. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRosekrans, J.
Gandal, the plaintiff in the first above entitled cause, is a judgment and execution creditor of the defend*653ant Finn, and moves to set aside the judgments in the other two causes, rendered by confession under section 383 of the code, on the ground that the statements upon which said judgments were rendered do not comply with the requirements of the second subdivision of that section. The judgments sought to be set aside were both entered up on the 14th of December, 1855, upon confessions dated on that day. The statement in the case of Mann & Kendrick, under this subdivision, is as follows :…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lawless v. HackettNew York Supreme Court · 1819
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bryan v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Thompson v. Van VechtenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Claflin v. SangerNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- State v. DonahoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1903
- Daly v. MathewsNew York Supreme Court · 1860
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.