Holden v. Heckler
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
The prevailing plaintiffs in this social security disability class action seek attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses from the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Under the statute, fees must be awarded unless “the position of the United States” —the Secretary’s substantive position and the government’s litigating position—was “substantially justified.” Review of the recently-amended statute, the relevant Sixth Circuit case law and the lengthy history of this action…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bunn v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Bailey v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Holden v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1986
- Weber v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Miller v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.