Legal Opinion
Bertrand v. Lala
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1992No. 91-CA-876PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRISBAUM, Judge.
Third party defendants, Theodore J. Lala and his insurer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF & G) appeal the judgment of the trial court granting third party defendant Chemfix Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on finding an indemnity provision in a lease contract between Lala and Chemfix was not valid under the rational of Ramirez v. Fair Grounds Corporation, 575 So.2d 811 ( La.1991). For the following reasons, we vacate the trial court judgment, deny the *789motion for summary judgment, and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiffs, Audrey Bertrand,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Penalber v. BlountSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Ramirez v. Fair Grounds Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Shafouk Nor El Din Hamza v. BourgeoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Davis v. Copeland Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Finley v. Safeco Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faucheaux v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hartman v. Bank of Louisiana in New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Lifecare Hosp. of New Orl. v. Lifemark Hos.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008