Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to make a motion to suppress photographs of the stolen automobile or to object to their admission at trial, defendant waived his argument that the photographs were the product of an illegal stop (see, People v Bertolo, 65 NY2d 111; People v Manners, 118 AD2d 734, lv denied 68 NY2d 670). Defendant was not entitled to a hearing on the admissibility of the photographs because his pretrial motion papers fail to state the ground for suppression or to set forth sworn allegations of fact (see, CPL 710.60 [1]; People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. MannersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SmytheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API