Legal Opinion

Stanley Warner Corporation v. Slattery

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 8, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HORA, Justice.

Respondent-appellant [the employer] is here appealing from a finding by the Industrial Accident Board that the Claimant-ap-pellee [the employee] was entitled to compensation.

For many years prior to 1966, claimant held two jobs simultaneously. During normal daytime hours he worked as a cashier for a local stockbroker firm, while at night he worked for the respondent as a maintenance man at a downtown theater. The nighttime job required manual labor activities, such as heavy lifting, climbing ladders to repair and change the marquee, and stooping to repair the seats in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Federal Bake Shops, Inc. v. MacZynskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
  5. DIXIE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Roy's Flying" A"Superior Court of Delaware · 1970
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. BigelowSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. American Consumer Industries, Inc. v. FehlSuperior Court of Delaware · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API