Legal Opinion

Slakman v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 6, 2003No. S03Q1075PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Shana Slakman, the wife of appellant Barry Slakman and daughter of appellees Barbara Adamo and Sherwin Glass, was insured under a life insurance policy issued by appellee Continental Casualty Company naming her husband as the beneficiary. After Shana’s death and Slakman’s indictment for her murder, Continental initiated an interpleader action in United States District Court to resolve conflicting claims to the benefits under the policy. Slakman subsequently was convicted of murder and his motion for new trial is currently pending before the Fulton County Superior Court.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Gibson v. TurpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. C. S. B.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Slakman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Currid v. DeKalb State Court Probation DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Colon v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc. v. Georgia Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API