Legal Opinion

State v. EUMANA-MORANCHEL

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 2011No. 081053188; A142632PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order excluding testimonial evidence concerning the blood alcohol content (BAC) of defendant, who was charged with misdemeanor driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

For purposes of the hearing on defendant’s motion to exclude, the parties stipulated to the following facts. A police officer observed defendant driving on a public roadway and, at 3:08 a.m., stopped defendant for weaving. Defendant displayed signs of intoxication and admitted to drinking three beers in a bar. Bars…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EUMANA-MORANCHELOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. WhitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. EUMANA-MORANCHELOregon Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API