Legal Opinion

A.D.P. v. Exxonmobil Research & Engineering Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 26, 2012PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ESPINOSA, J.A.D.

In this appeal, we consider whether summary judgment was properly granted to an employer that required a long-term employee whose job performance was satisfactory to submit to random alcohol testing and terminated her employment when a test showed she had used alcohol. Because the record revealed that the basis for the testing and termination was the employee’s voluntary disclosure that she was an alcoholic and not the result of inadequate job performance, the imposition of these conditions constituted direct evidence of discrimination.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maryanne Grande v. Saint Clare’s Health System (076606) (Morris County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  2. Robert Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad(074685)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. Stewart v. County of SalemDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  4. Bertolotti v. AutoZone, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  5. ALI ALALWAN VS. RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE (L-4492-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API