In re Ladas

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on January 10, 1991, and maintained an office for the practice of law in West Seneca. The Grievance Committee filed a peti*203tion charging respondent with acts of professional misconduct, including converting estate funds. Respondent filed an answer admitting the material allegations of the petition, and appeared before this Court to submit matters in mitigation.

We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (a) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4])…