Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Frazier

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1971No. 1Published

1DissentJustice Lake

The motion to quash the indictment should have been allowed and, therefore, the judgment below should be reversed for the reason that the indictment does not charge a criminal offense. I, therefore, dissent from the majority opinion directing a new trial.

The statute in effect at the time of the alleged acts of the defendant, G.S. 14-12.12, made the conduct therein proscribed a crime. The difficulty is the bill of indictment does not charge the defendant with the conduct proscribed by the statute.

The acts declared by this statute to be a crime are: “to place or cause to be placed on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Asbury v. Town of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API