Legal Opinion
Claude A. Nunnally v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1956No. 7308PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s appeal in this action under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (2), raises the question whether his property or any interest therein has been taken by the United States within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. The complaint also alleged a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), but plaintiff concedes that he proved no case under that act.
The United States established the Dahlgren Naval Proving Ground at Dahl-gren, Virginia, in 1918. Since that time sixteen-inch naval guns and many other types of ordnance have been tested there.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bedford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by19 opinions
- Batten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Dennison v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Town of East Haven v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- Newton H. Ancarrow and Josephine Ancarrow v. City of Richmond, Newton H. Ancarrow and Josephine Ancarrow v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Dennison v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.