Legal Opinion

Maiatico v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 9, 1949No. Docket No. 10393Published

Held, petitioner's wife, as trustee for their four minor children, can not be recognized for income tax purposes as a member of a certain partnership dealing in real estate.

1Opinion of the Court

Jerry Maiatico, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Maiatico v. Commissioner

Docket No. 10393

United States Tax Court

12 T.C. 146; 1949 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 281;

February 9, 1949, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Held, petitioner's wife, as trustee for their four minor children, can not be recognized for income tax purposes as a member of a certain partnership dealing in real estate.

John E. Shea, Esq., and George E. McMurray, Jr., Esq., for the petitioner.

Elmer L. Corbin, Esq., for the respondent.

Van Fossan, Judge.

VAN FOSSAN

The Commissioner determined a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Harrison v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Commissioner v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API