Legal Opinion

State v. Gainey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1996No. 138A95PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

Defendants were tried jointly and noncapitally for first-degree murder and for discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle. The jury found both defendants guilty on both charges. The trial court sentenced each defendant to a mandatory term of life imprisonment on the murder convictions and sentenced defendants to three years’ imprisonment for discharging a firearm into occupied property, to run concurrently with the murder sentences. We hold that defendants received a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence at trial tended to show that on the evening…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Richardson Engineering Co. v. William L. Crow Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. PickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. GeddieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Edward Ernest Hartman v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API