Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 25, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, Ch. J.

Twenty-three seamen, each suing for one month’s wages, have joined in this action based upon section 594 of title 46 of the United States Code (U. S. Rev. Stat. § 4527; chap. 322, act of June 7, 1872, § 21; 17 U. S. Stat. at Large, 266), which reads as follows: “Any seaman who has signed an agreement and is afterward discharged before the commencement of the voyage or before one month’s wages are earned, without fault on his part justifying such discharge, and without his consent, shall be entitled to receive from the master or owner, in addition to any wages he may have earned, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Steel TraderSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Calvin v. HuntleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph A. Zarraga, in No. 13226, Martin D. Ladd, in No. 13,227, George Martin, in No. 13,228 v. Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Newman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Hopkins v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API