Legal Opinion

Neuman & Schwiers Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 29, 1932No. 3486Published

1Opinion of the CourtGaReett, Judge

The merchandise here involved appears to be commonly known as liver paste.

It was classified by the collector as “meats, prepared, not specially provided for,” under paragraph 706 of the Tariff Act.of 1922, duty being assessed at 20 per centum ad valorem.

Importer made protest, claiming the merchandise to be properly dutiable at 2 cents per pound as “other pork, prepared or preserved,” under paragraph 703 of said act.

*376The pertinent portions of the competing paragraphs are:

Par. 706. Meats, fresh, prepared, or preserved, not specially provided for, 20 per centum ad valorem: * * *.

Par. 703. Swine,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API