Legal Opinion
Alford v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 2000No. F030847PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KALASHIAN, J. *
The Department of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter Department) revoked appellant Steven Willis Alford’s vehicle salesperson’s license after he was criminally convicted of petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, §§ 666/484) and assault (Pen. Code, § 241, subd. (a)). In an administrative mandamus proceeding in superior court, appellant contended that the revocation was unlawful and that the Department could suspend but not revoke the license. He argued that Government Code section 11517, former subdivision (b), barred the Department from revoking his license after the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walt Rankin & Associates, Inc. v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Brierton v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ventimiglia v. Board of Behavioral SciencesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- WALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATES v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000