Legal Opinion

People v. Holland

New York County Courts

Decided December 30, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul J. Widlitz, J.

Defendant moves for a trial by jury of certain issues of fact raised by him in connection with a hearing on his application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis. By an order of the Appellate Division, Second Department, dated March 25, 1960, the petitioner’s application was granted to the extent that a hearing was ordered to be held to inquire into the truthfulness of the allegations contained therein. Defendant asserts that he is entitled to a trial by jury as a matter of right. ,

The writ of error ooram nobis at common law was essentially a civil proceeding (State v. Calhoun, 50 Kan.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Matter of Lyons v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. People v. McCulloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. Orange County CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. United States ex rel. Holland v. MurphyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1963
  3. In re DelhommeNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API