Legal Opinion

Ultimate Corp. v. CG Data Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1991No. Nos. 89-2964, 90-95, 90-1565PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Based on the following analysis, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of the fraud and conspiracy counts. We affirm the summary judgment appealed which held the defendants liable under a promissory note.

As to defendants’ arguments contesting the entry of summary judgment, we find only two points raised merit discussion. First, the promissory note did not require documentary stamps be paid upon it before recovery could be had on the note since the note was brought to Florida solely for collection. See 1980 Op.Att’y Gen. Fla. 080-79 (Sept. 24, 1980) (where a promissory note was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Osborne v. Delta Maintenance & Welding, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Bernard Marko & Associates, Inc. v. SteeleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Wackenhut Protective Sys. v. KEY BISCAYNE, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Enstrom v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Blatch v. WesleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Clerk of Circuit CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Wong v. Crown Equipment Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Vivona v. Colony Point 5 Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Wong v. Crown Equipment Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API