Legal Opinion

Air Engineering Metal Trades Council v. Aro, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 5, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action to enforce arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement. 29 U.S.C. § 185. The Court has *8jurisdiction of such matters under 28 U.S.C. § 1337 and 29 U.S.C. § 185. Both parties seek a summary judgment. Rule 56 (b), (c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The current dispute between these parties is whether the defendant can be compelled to arbitrate with the plaintiff-union for an open shop on the defendant’s premises, located within the geographical bounds of the state of Tennessee, when Tennessee has made open shops…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Air Engineering Metal Trades Council & Affiliated Unions v. Aro, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API