Legal Opinion

Middelkamp v. Hanewich

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1970No. 1269A233PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, P.J.

This appeal arises from an action commenced by plaintiffs-appellants for the rescission of a warranty deed, plaintiffs alleging fraud on the part of defendantsHanewichs in inducing the transfer of title by plaintiffs to defendants. The trial court, without a jury, sustained motions for judgment made by each of the defendants-appellees at the close of plaintiffs-appellants’ evidence.

Inasmuch as judgment was entered at the close of plaintiffs-appellants’ evidence, this court may consider only the evidence, together with any reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom, most favorable to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Majewski v. GallinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sachs v. BlewettIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. McCord v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Westphal v. HeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Middelkamp v. HanewichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Al Vaughn, Marjorie Vaughn, Algon Corporation and Springfield Drive-Ins, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation and Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Coffey v. WiningerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Soft Water Utilities, Inc. v. LeFevreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API