Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 1884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Kent County. This was an action of ejectment, instituted on the 11th of April, 1882, by the appellants against the appellee. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, which are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the Court. By consent a pro forma, judgment was entered in the Court below in favor of the defendant, with the right of appeal by the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This is an action of ejectment, brought by the appellants, as heirs-at-law of Catharine H. Wroth, to recover an undivided half interest in a tract of land, of which she died seized.

The facts are these: Mrs. Wroth died in December, 1854, leaving a paper purporting to be a will, by which she devised the farm in controversy to her husband, Peregrine Wroth, for life, with remainder in fee to her nephew, George A. Hanson.

*27The will was not executed in due form to pass real ■estate, as required by the Act of 1842, chapter 293, then in force, because the consent of her husband, in writing, was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith ex dem. Teller v. BurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  2. Bedell v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Howard v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Dean v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Corporation v. AlcornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Gore v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Wickes v. WickesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. Zehner v. FinkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Brown v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API