Legal Opinion

Witter v. Witter

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1994No. 94 CA 0378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JzSHORTESS, Judge.

Phillips Connell Witter (plaintiff) and Joan Wegman Witter (defendant) have been involved in what plaintiffs counsel terms “protracted, heated litigation” for some time. After she and plaintiff were divorced, defendant married Russell L. Dornier (Dormer). Dor-nier, an attorney, filed on defendant’s behalf a rule to have plaintiff held in constructive contempt. The basis for the contempt rule was defendant’s failure to pay a note executed as part of the property settlement between plaintiff and defendant. That agreement had been homologated and made a part of a consent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penton v. ClarksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Murphy v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Matter of Succession of ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. First American Bank & Trust v. First Guar. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curole v. Avondale Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Aisola v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Slaughter v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University & Agricultural & Mechanical CollegeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API