Legal Opinion

Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (Two Cases)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 17, 1952No. 10812_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Circuit Judge.

For nearly six years, the Civil Aeronautics Board has been trying to establish feeder air service in two important areas of the United States. These appeals mark the *399most recent skirmish, in what has been a protracted administrative and judicial struggle. The order under attack in No. 10811, the Parks Investigation Case,1 awarded routes lying generally within an area bounded by Tulsa, Memphis, Indianapolis, Chicago and Kansas City. No. 10812, the Reopened Mississippi Valley and Southeastern States Cases,2 involves routes lying generally between Memphis and New Orleans.

Ba…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Pan American Airways Co. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Simmons v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  4. National Air Freight Forwarding Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API