Golden Peanut Co. v. Bass
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceAndrews, Presiding Judge
Although I concur fully in Divisions 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6,1 must concur specially as to Division 3 because I believe Golden Peanut (Golden) was entitled to a directed verdict on the issue of accord and *241satisfaction.
As set out in the majority, it is not disputed that in October 1990, Coan, on behalf of Golden, told Bass and Varner that $875 per ton on the quota peanuts and the floor price on the additional peanuts was all that Golden was going to pay and there would be no further discussion of the 1990 peanuts. It is also undisputed that, after this declaration by Coan, Varner-Bass was sent,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Redmond & Co. v. Atlanta & Birmingham Air-Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Hamilton & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Gary v. E. FRANK MILLER CONSTR. CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- M. Walter & Co. v. North Highland Assembly of God, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988