National Carloading Corp. v. Phœnix-El Paso Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McGILL, Commissioner.
In Acme Fast Freight, Inc., v. United States, D.C., 30 F.Supp. 968, affirmed in 309 U.S. 638, 60 S.Ct. 810, 84 L.Ed. 993, it was held that freight forwarders conducting businesses similar to appellant’s were not common carriers by motor vehicle within the purview of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 301-327, and were not entitled to a certificate of public convenience and necessity under the so-called “grandfather” clause of Sec. 206(a), 49 U.S.C.A. § 306(a), or to establish and share in joint rates with common carriers by motor vehicle within the meaning of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- National Carloading Corp. v. Phoenix-El Paso Express, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- Lee v. Mitchell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Kemp v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- General Capital Corporation v. Tel Service Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Beatty v. Holmes, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.