Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided January 13, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Tim Wooldridge State Representative 100 College Drive Paragould, AR 72450

Dear Representative Wooldridge:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question:

Can a municipality continue to collect a tax from a resident even when the service for which that tax was passed is not being offered or made available to the resident?

You state that a municipally owned cable television system was established several years ago in Paragould, and that a tax was authorized by special election to support a bond issue, with the tax suspended unless project revenues were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennington v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Carter v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Jackson v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API