Legal Opinion

Great Neck Improvement Corp. v. Shoreward Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdel, J.

Motion made by two certain defendants to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the grounds that it appears on the face of the complaint: (1) That the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue, for the reason that Louis Guerr and Richard Rosso, co-owners with the plaintiff of undivided interests in the bond and mortgage referred to in the complaint, are not made parties plaintiff in this action, and (2) that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Action is to foreclose a mortgage upon real property forg$110,000 made by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clare v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Dahl v. LevenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Clare v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank v. JaffaNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API