Legal Opinion

Filmat Realty Corp. v. Carleo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 18, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The relationship here was that of landlord and tenant with an allowance for services. There was no employment for wages. There was no denial of the appellant’s testimony that he entered the premises as a tenant and many years subsequently was allowed a deduction from his rent for services. No termination of the original tenancy was established. Rent, as such, continued to be paid. Services were valued in terms of rent.

The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to appellant, and petition dismissed.

MacCrate, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ.,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dobson Factors, Inc. v. DattoryCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  2. Yui Woon Kwong v. GuidoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. Tursi v. EspositoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
  4. Maio v. BorrelliMount Vernon City Court · 1948
  5. York Sham Wong Yee v. IndelicatoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API