Legal Opinion

Brandimore v. Dickens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 35,334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

In the course of protracted litigation involving real estate, Lewis M. Dickens, who claimed to be interested, under a trust mortgage, and without title, executed a mortgage on the property to Alfred J. Brandimore for $650,000. Brandimore filed the bill herein to foreclose the mortgage and have a receiver appointed. Dickens filed consent to the appointment of a receiver. Upon the bill and such consent, without notice to persons in possession or interest, a receiver was appointed under a bond of $100, and at once assumed possession. The next morning, attorneys representing parties dispossessed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Constantini v. HoferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Granader v. Public BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967
  4. Adler v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Attorney General v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API