Legal Opinion

Smith v. Holt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 3, 1953No. 40972PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Thomas W. Smith, who acquired the Ei/2 of the SW^ of the SWj^ Section 30, T. 17 N., R. 9 E., Richland Parish, which land was subject to a reservation of all the minerals made on October 28, 1939, by a former owner, defendant J. E. Holt, instituted this proceeding against Holt and those who acquired mineral and royalty interests through him, to be declared the owner of the mineral-mights and to have defendants disclaim title thereto because of the claimed expiration of the servitude through non-use for a period of ten years; and he is appealing from a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hightower v. MaritzkySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Achee v. CaillouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Everett v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Delatte v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. Dixon v. American Liberty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. Boddie v. DrewettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Horn v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  5. Sun Oil Company v. State Mineral BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API