Legal Opinion
D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1941No. 11779PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.
Two questions are determinative of this appeal: (1) Whether the promissory note involved is governed by the law of Illinois or of Missouri; and (2) whether, under the law of the applicable state, the in-dorsee of a demand note, given for the accommodation of the payee and negotiated more than five years after its execution, may have the status of a holder in due course.
Plaintiff (appellee) has a corporate existence under 12 U.S.C.A. § 264, Act of June 16, 1933, c. 89, § 8, as amended. Defendant (appellant) is a Missouri corporation.
The action was one upon a promissory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tilden v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Miller v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Naef v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Hogue-Kellogg Co. v. G. L. Webster Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Foreman Trust & Savings Bank v. CohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Collins v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. Metz GroupDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Civic Plaza National Bank v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.