Legal Opinion
Bill HARNESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORP., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1989No. 88-5791Published
1Opinion of the Court
877 F.2d 1307
50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 376,
50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,122,
11 Employee Benefits Ca 1233
Bill HARNESS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORP., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 88-5791.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued March 21, 1989.
Decided June 27, 1989.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 10, 1989.
Sam Hayward, Philip C. Kimball (argued), Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff-appellant.
Ronald D. Ray, Robert H. Keats, Frank P. Hilliard (argued), Louisville, Ky., for defendant-appellee.
Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
BAILEY…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.