Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2018No. NOS. CA2017-07-101; CA2017-07-103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Pursuant to App.R. 26(A)(2) and Loc.R. 18(D), this court sua sponte determined that a conflict existed regarding our review of jail-time credit involving house arrest as discussed in State v. Fillinger , 12th Dist., 2016-Ohio-8455, 72 N.E.3d 671, and State v. Porter , 12th Dist. Warren, 2018-Ohio-3123, 106 N.E.3d 125. Therefore, this court considered the matter en banc.

{¶ 2} After holding an en banc conference pursuant to Loc.R. 18(D), a majority of the judges of this court have determined that a defendant is not entitled to jail-time credit for the time he or she is subject to house…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NapierOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. FillingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. BowlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WhitedOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. DeeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. MaldonadoOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API