State v. Porter
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} Pursuant to App.R. 26(A)(2) and Loc.R. 18(D), this court sua sponte determined that a conflict existed regarding our review of jail-time credit involving house arrest as discussed in State v. Fillinger , 12th Dist., 2016-Ohio-8455, 72 N.E.3d 671, and State v. Porter , 12th Dist. Warren, 2018-Ohio-3123, 106 N.E.3d 125. Therefore, this court considered the matter en banc.
{¶ 2} After holding an en banc conference pursuant to Loc.R. 18(D), a majority of the judges of this court have determined that a defendant is not entitled to jail-time credit for the time he or she is subject to house…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. NapierOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FillingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. BowlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WhitedOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. DeeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. MaldonadoOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018