Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Howser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1981No. 80-0708-J-3, CA 18103, SC 27737Published

1Opinion of the Court

632 P.2d 782 (1981)

291 Or. 475

Holly Jean WHIPPLE, Plaintiff,

v.

Mark Thomas HOWSER and Thomas C. Howser, Defendants.

Mark Thomas HOWSER and Thomas C. Howser, Petitioners,

v.

Monique BEHRENDT, Respondent.

No. 80-0708-J-3; CA 18103; SC 27737.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted June 30, 1981.

Decided August 11, 1981.

William E. Duhaime, Medford, argued the cause for petitioners.

John W. Eads, Jr., Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Frohnmayer, Deatherage, deSchweinitz & Eads, Medford.

Linda J. Rudnick and Clayton C. Patrick, Oregon Trial Lawyers…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Untermyer v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Greyhound Corp. v. Mt. Hood Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API