Legal Opinion

Benefield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1932No. A-8285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Kiowa county, of the crime of sale of a forged evidence of debt, and his punishment fixed by the court at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of four years.

Defendant complains of numerous errors, but to dispose of the case it will only be necessary to consider one of them; that is, that the court erred in overruling his motion to dismiss because the case was not brought to trial at the next term of court and no good cause to the contrary shown for the delay.

It appears from the record that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petitti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CarpelaSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API