Legal Opinion

Atlanta Consol. St. Ry. Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1901No. 1,282PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At Law. Or deRrarrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

Mrs. Susie A. Owiugs brought suit iu the city court of Atlauta agaiust the Atlauta Oousolidated Street-Railway Compauy. The declaratiou iu her case agaiust the cousolidated compauy, beiug quite brief, is given iu full, as follows:

“The petition of Susie A. Owings respectfully shows that the Atlanta Consolidated Street-Railway Company, a corporation of said county, has injured and damaged your iiotitioner in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars, for that heretofore, to wit, on the sixtli day of September, 1S93, her husband, the late A. Y. Owings, was am employé of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Faith v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Village of Portland v. Citizens Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. City of Tacoma v. BonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Alaska Steamship Co. v. Pacific Coast Gypsum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. City of Puyallup v. VergoweWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API